Natürlich ist es möglich, dynamische Klassen mit sehr coolen ExpandoObject Klasse zu erstellen. Aber vor kurzem arbeitete ich auf Projekt und konfrontiert, dass Expando Object in nicht das gleiche Format auf xml als eine einfache anonyme Klasse serealisiert ist, es war schade =( , deshalb habe ich beschlossen, meine eigene Klasse zu erstellen und teilen Sie es mit Ihnen. Sie verwendet Reflexion und dynamische Direktive, baut Assembly, Klasse und Instanz wirklich dynamisch auf. Sie können Eigenschaften hinzufügen, entfernen und ändern, die in Ihrer Klasse enthalten sind. Hier ist sie:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Reflection;
using System.Reflection.Emit;
using static YourNamespace.DynamicTypeBuilderTest;
namespace YourNamespace
{
/// This class builds Dynamic Anonymous Classes
public class DynamicTypeBuilderTest
{
///
/// Create instance based on any Source class as example based on PersonalData
///
public static object CreateAnonymousDynamicInstance(PersonalData personalData, Type dynamicType, List<ClassDescriptorKeyValue> classDescriptionList)
{
var obj = Activator.CreateInstance(dynamicType);
var propInfos = dynamicType.GetProperties();
classDescriptionList.ForEach(x => SetValueToProperty(obj, propInfos, personalData, x));
return obj;
}
private static void SetValueToProperty(object obj, PropertyInfo[] propInfos, PersonalData aisMessage, ClassDescriptorKeyValue description)
{
propInfos.SingleOrDefault(x => x.Name == description.Name)?.SetValue(obj, description.ValueGetter(aisMessage), null);
}
public static dynamic CreateAnonymousDynamicType(string entityName, List<ClassDescriptorKeyValue> classDescriptionList)
{
AssemblyName asmName = new AssemblyName();
asmName.Name = $"{entityName}Assembly";
AssemblyBuilder assemblyBuilder = AssemblyBuilder.DefineDynamicAssembly(asmName, AssemblyBuilderAccess.RunAndCollect);
ModuleBuilder moduleBuilder = assemblyBuilder.DefineDynamicModule($"{asmName.Name}Module");
TypeBuilder typeBuilder = moduleBuilder.DefineType($"{entityName}Dynamic", TypeAttributes.Public);
classDescriptionList.ForEach(x => CreateDynamicProperty(typeBuilder, x));
return typeBuilder.CreateTypeInfo().AsType();
}
private static void CreateDynamicProperty(TypeBuilder typeBuilder, ClassDescriptorKeyValue description)
{
CreateDynamicProperty(typeBuilder, description.Name, description.Type);
}
///
///Creation Dynamic property (from MSDN) with some Magic
///
public static void CreateDynamicProperty(TypeBuilder typeBuilder, string name, Type propType)
{
FieldBuilder fieldBuider = typeBuilder.DefineField($"{name.ToLower()}Field",
propType,
FieldAttributes.Private);
PropertyBuilder propertyBuilder = typeBuilder.DefineProperty(name,
PropertyAttributes.HasDefault,
propType,
null);
MethodAttributes getSetAttr =
MethodAttributes.Public | MethodAttributes.SpecialName |
MethodAttributes.HideBySig;
MethodBuilder methodGetBuilder =
typeBuilder.DefineMethod($"get_{name}",
getSetAttr,
propType,
Type.EmptyTypes);
ILGenerator methodGetIL = methodGetBuilder.GetILGenerator();
methodGetIL.Emit(OpCodes.Ldarg_0);
methodGetIL.Emit(OpCodes.Ldfld, fieldBuider);
methodGetIL.Emit(OpCodes.Ret);
MethodBuilder methodSetBuilder =
typeBuilder.DefineMethod($"set_{name}",
getSetAttr,
null,
new Type[] { propType });
ILGenerator methodSetIL = methodSetBuilder.GetILGenerator();
methodSetIL.Emit(OpCodes.Ldarg_0);
methodSetIL.Emit(OpCodes.Ldarg_1);
methodSetIL.Emit(OpCodes.Stfld, fieldBuider);
methodSetIL.Emit(OpCodes.Ret);
propertyBuilder.SetGetMethod(methodGetBuilder);
propertyBuilder.SetSetMethod(methodSetBuilder);
}
public class ClassDescriptorKeyValue
{
public ClassDescriptorKeyValue(string name, Type type, Func<PersonalData, object> valueGetter)
{
Name = name;
ValueGetter = valueGetter;
Type = type;
}
public string Name;
public Type Type;
public Func<PersonalData, object> ValueGetter;
}
///
///Your Custom class description based on any source class for example
/// PersonalData
public static IEnumerable<ClassDescriptorKeyValue> GetAnonymousClassDescription(bool includeAddress, bool includeFacebook)
{
yield return new ClassDescriptorKeyValue("Id", typeof(string), x => x.Id);
yield return new ClassDescriptorKeyValue("Name", typeof(string), x => x.FirstName);
yield return new ClassDescriptorKeyValue("Surname", typeof(string), x => x.LastName);
yield return new ClassDescriptorKeyValue("Country", typeof(string), x => x.Country);
yield return new ClassDescriptorKeyValue("Age", typeof(int?), x => x.Age);
yield return new ClassDescriptorKeyValue("IsChild", typeof(bool), x => x.Age < 21);
if (includeAddress)
yield return new ClassDescriptorKeyValue("Address", typeof(string), x => x?.Contacts["Address"]);
if (includeFacebook)
yield return new ClassDescriptorKeyValue("Facebook", typeof(string), x => x?.Contacts["Facebook"]);
}
///
///Source Data Class for example
/// of cause you can use any other class
public class PersonalData
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
public string Country { get; set; }
public int Age { get; set; }
public Dictionary<string, string> Contacts { get; set; }
}
}
}
Es ist auch sehr einfach, DynamicTypeBuilder zu verwenden, Sie müssen nur ein paar Zeilen wie diese einfügen:
public class ExampleOfUse
{
private readonly bool includeAddress;
private readonly bool includeFacebook;
private readonly dynamic dynamicType;
private readonly List<ClassDescriptorKeyValue> classDiscriptionList;
public ExampleOfUse(bool includeAddress = false, bool includeFacebook = false)
{
this.includeAddress = includeAddress;
this.includeFacebook = includeFacebook;
this.classDiscriptionList = DynamicTypeBuilderTest.GetAnonymousClassDescription(includeAddress, includeFacebook).ToList();
this.dynamicType = DynamicTypeBuilderTest.CreateAnonymousDynamicType("VeryPrivateData", this.classDiscriptionList);
}
public object Map(PersonalData privateInfo)
{
object dynamicObject = DynamicTypeBuilderTest.CreateAnonymousDynamicInstance(privateInfo, this.dynamicType, classDiscriptionList);
return dynamicObject;
}
}
Ich hoffe, dass dieser Codeschnipsel jemandem hilft =) Viel Spaß!
0 Stimmen
ExpandoObject, nicht ExpandObject (mit 'o').